It's been busy of late.  I have a pile of seventy five-page papers that demand my attention.  My department just underwent an external review, which took some time as well.  And then there is the usual class preparation, writing anxiety, family stuff, etc.  Thus, blogging has been a bit off (even if those papers are not nearly all graded).

In any event, this evening [update: no, next week!] I have the pleasant task of going to dinner with a group of students here. They are holders of very prestigious scholarships and they have asked me to make some remarks about the imminent presidential election.  So, I am going to sketch out my comments here.

First, I think at this point it is a safe bet that Obama is going to win.  So, instead of getting down into the details of the campaigns, the strategies and speeches (which I follow fairly closely), I want to step back and think for a moment about the meaning of an Obama presidency.

I notice how critics of Obama sneer at those of us who support him, saying that we are making him into a messiah.  That is not at all my perspective.  He is a politician.  He will do some things that I will admire, he will do some things that I dislike.  He will pragmatically compromise.  The policy changes he brings will not be as extensive as his most ardent supporters suppose.  And his shortcomings will not collapse the republic (indeed, if we can survive eight years of W. we can survive just about anything!).  Yet, for all of that, there is a way in which an Obama presidency will be transformational.

Obama has been very careful and smart in the ways that he talks, and does not talk, about race.  He does not play it up; he brings it up only when others introduce it into the discussion.  His victory speech after the Iowa caucus, a key turning point in his campaign, was remarkable in this manner, in the unity message it presented.   But, however shrewd his political strategy, race matters.  The fact of a black man as president is of historical significance, and we must recognize it as such. 

I am not that old.  51.  Born in 1957.  But I have a clear memory, from when I was about 5 or 6 years old, of visiting relatives in Virginia.  We were at a restaurant and my sister, four years older than me, burst out crying.  She had seen a sign that read: "Whites Only."  She knew what it meant and it frustrated and saddened her to the point of tears.  I remember her face, her cries.  I didn't understand what was going on myself, but I came to understand.  Her reaction became a tangible sign post for my gradual awareness of segregation and racism in America.  It wasn't that long ago.

Of course, since then there has been a colossal struggle to redress the historical wrongs inflicted on African Americans.  We can talk about progress but we can also talk about continuing problems.  An Obama presidency, however, suggests a transformation of sorts.  To the extent that the president is the face of the nation, that face will now be black.  The years of restriction and repression, the obstacles of prejudice and bias, the pain and sorrow of so many dreams deferred, will now be transcended.  He will be a powerful symbol of possibility for all Americans – not only African Americans but those of Hispanic and Asian and other heritages.  He will stand as a sign of opportunity for all.  He will not solve all of our problems, but he will allow us to see ourselves in a new light, a new color.  And that is a beautiful thing.

I also agree with those who point out that Obama as president will improve the way the world looks at the US.  Racial prejudice has long been used by critics of America to point out the hypocrisy of our democratic ideals and promises.  While racism will not disappear with the election of one man, Obama's presence will powerfully work against that critique.  The multiculturalism that he symbolizes will display for the world a revived sense of American justice and opportunity. And that is all for the good.

I am not a wild-eyed idealist.  I fully expect disappointments and mistakes from an Obama administration.  But the historical moment is remarkable.  His election will be an achievement in itself.  And there is a possibility for a coming-together that might produce a more participatory and just society.  The hearts of many, many of us, to remember another transformational president, may well be touched by "the better angels of our nature."

Yes we can!

UPDATE: Nicholas Kristof has some similar reflections in today's (Thursday's) NYT

Sam Crane Avatar

Published by

Categories:

8 responses to “Thoughts on President Obama”

  1. gmoke Avatar

    I was watching the funeral of Coretta Scott King on CSPAN when it hit me in my heart what a gift MLK Jr gave this country and the world. I was born in 1950 and my life has been widened considerably by the civil rights struggle. I have friends and colleagues whom I might never have met without it. The progress we have made within my own lifetime is amazing and we don’t recognize it often enough.
    As for Obama winning election, don’t count your chickens yet. It looks good but anything can happen.

    Like

  2. David Avatar

    Interesting news about the external review of the Political Science department. When the College as a whole underwent reaccreditation, Roger Bolton placed the College’s report on itself and the outsiders comments on the web for all to read. Will the Political Science department do the same? If not, is there any way for interested alums to read the documents?

    Like

  3. Taoist Voter Avatar
    Taoist Voter

    What good is a black President if there a million black people in prison, and this President has no initiatives to help them?
    What difference will be made in foreign policy when Obama has all but stated he wants to continue the Bush Doctrine of pre-emptive war, and has hinted that he wants to expand the “war on terror” to Pakistan?
    What differences will be made to the thousands of Americans who have been imprisoned without charges and without rights—-because of their race—-when Obama supports the Patriot Act?
    Where are the initiatives from the Obama camp on matters that effect minorities in this country—why the silence on establishing a living wage, on tackling systemic poverty (which mostly afflicts blacks and other minorities), on the education budget?
    I do not see Obama as a “beautiful thing” for minorities in America any more than I see Condaleeza Rice (whom he voted to confirm despite her complicity in the war crimes of the Bush Administration) as a shining beacon of hope.
    Make no mistake—Obama’s record is not one of change. On the contrary, he reminds me of this part of the Tao Te Ching:
    “When the state is benighted
    There are loyal ministers”
    Look at his voting record. Look at his policies. Obama is just another “loyal minister”.

    Like

  4. isha Avatar
    isha

    October 22, 2008
    The War Party Embraces Obama
    Just remember: you’ve been warned…

    http://antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=13623


    Obama wants to invade Pakistan and flood Afghanistan with yet more U.S. troops, and he will likely let two spies who funneled top secret intelligence to Israel off scot-free. Why wouldn’t the War Party be perfectly satisfied with the election? After all, they’re done with Iraq, anyway. We’re about to be invited to leave. And he’s good – from their perspective – on the Russian question, which promises to be the key area of future neocon mischief-making.
    Our war-birds are naturally migratory creatures, effortlessly moving from branch to branch, and party to party, with no compunction whatsoever about changing either their nesting habits or the color of their feathers, so long as their ultimate goal – promoting conflict, in whatever form – is achieved. Republicans, Democrats, independents, or whatever: it’s the same program, with the same result – an America perpetually at war, defending and extending the frontiers of its empire, without regard for the costs, either financial or purely human.

    Obama will merely put another face on the same old policies, albeit more friendly and less offensive to our own elites, who would rather not be so rudely confronted with the ruthlessness of their rulers.

    Like

  5. isha Avatar
    isha

    She: But president? That’s such an important job! In America, I thought blacks were janitors and laborers.
    Me: No, blacks have all kinds of jobs.

    [Long pause.]

    She: Really? Unbelievable! What an amazing country!

    Mr.Nicholas Kristof: Do you as a rule only give interview to misinformed, innately bigotry, childish china men or china women or do you have to put your words into Chinamen/woman’s mouth to make your point? Surely news sensitive Chinese would know of Rice and Powell’s important role in constructing the U.S. policy. But on the other hand, Kristof and his neo-con friends do have the decency to let the cat out of the bag: what do they want is, “Rebranding the U.S. with Obama”, namely, keeping the same policy but changing the image in order to make it far more sellable. For you and your cable, Mr. Kristof, U.S. is a just a replaceable commodities to be consumed for your advantage and you will use Obama as your poster boy to do your marketing. At least some of us know your tricks.

    Like

  6. David Martin Avatar
    David Martin

    Like gmoke, I was born in 1950. I was legally a resident of Pennsylvania, so I did a prospective-student tour of Penn State’s main campus. I noticed more or less immediately that it was nearly all white. To this day, I regret not having asked about the situation, something I surely would have done had the university been in a southern state.

    Like

  7. Kayla Avatar
    Kayla

    All i have to say is that we, as a country, are going to be fine. I am not against Obama, i just know that him becoming president was in Gods will and if we believe and trust God with all of this, and put it in his hands, he will take control and protect and do what He wants for this country. We just need faith.

    Like

  8. isha Avatar
    isha

    Obama said in a speech to U.S. troops that the war is a “vital mission” and that he is determined to achieve victory:

    “Your services are absolutely necessary, absolutely essential to America’s safety and security… If this region slides backwards, if the Taliban retakes this country and al Qaeda can operate with impunity, then more American lives will be at stake… You will be backed up by a clear mission and the right strategy to finish the job, to get the job done. And I am confident all of you are going to get the job done right here in Afghanistan… That’s why I ordered more troops and civilians here into Afghanistan shortly after taking office. That’s why we took a hard look and forged a new strategy and committed more resources in December… Our broad mission is clear: We are going to disrupt and dismantle, defeat and destroy al Qaeda and its extremist allies… There’s going to be setbacks. We face a determined enemy. But we also know this: The United States of America does not quit once it starts on something. You don’t quit, the American armed services does not quit, we keep at it, we persevere, and together with our partners we will prevail.”

    Rebranding the U.S. with Obama”, namely, keeping the same policy but changing the image in order to make it far more sellable.

    still sellable? are you sure, isha?

    October 22, 2008
    The War Party Embraces Obama
    Just remember: you’ve been warned…
    http://antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=13623

    Like

Leave a reply to gmoke Cancel reply