We have reached that moment in American presidential campaigns when I realize just how far out of the mainstream of the indigenous political cultural I am.  The precise instant was last night, as I suffered through Sarah Palin's speech

       What struck me was my divergence with the general view, splashed across the television and print media, that her delivery of the speech was excellent.   That is not what I heard or saw.  Here is what I wrote in a comment on another blog: "OK, call me an elitist, but her
delivery was terrible. It lacked fluidity. The cadences were all wrong.
She emphasized the wrong words in certain sentences. It was painful to
listen to. If I spoke like that in any lecture I gave, I would be, and
should be, fired. It is true that she read the words off the
teleprompter without screwing them up but it was obvious that that was
all she was doing. There was little naturalness in her speech – save,
perhaps, when she blew a kiss to the other POW. It was too obvious that
the words were not her own…"

    For the record, I also never understood Ronald Reagan's charisma nor the political potential of George W. Bush.  Together with Palin, all of these people strike me as unable to think on their feet; they lack the intellectual capacity for distilling complex policy problems into concise, actionable statements.  Call me elitist.

     Reagan obviously had more experience than Palin, and a longer track record of working politically for the presidency.  Bush…well, let's not even talk about it.

      To get back to Palin, there was nothing in her speech, nothing about her speech, neither its presentation nor its content, that demonstrated, to me at least (and to this writer as well), her capacity to critically and practically engage national and international policy issues.  But this is where I fail to comprehend American political culture.  Overwhelmingly, commentators are praising the speech as " excellent," a "home run," a "grand slam."   For a baseball analogy, it struck me as a slow roller down the third base line and the umpire called her safe at first, even though the throw clearly got there before her….

    So, I guess I should just give up on commenting on US politics.  It is obviously beyond me.  The scarier thought, of course, is that Republican media smear machine might just win this thing for McCain, just as it did for Bush in 2000 and 2004.  What is a Massachusetts liberal to do?  I don't have to worry about getting out the vote in my county, which is solidly Obama.  I have no influence over popular opinion in the battleground states and no access to Obama campaign strategy.  I'll send in some more money but, beyond that, I can only really sit and wait.  Do nothing, as it were.

     And that is where the Taoism helps.  I am powerless.  Things may turn out badly: a McCain presidency and a continuation of Republican executive power is a real possibility.  After eight disastrous years of Bush, Way might continue to be lost in the country.  And, as Confucius says, it might then be best to "stay hidden."   But Taoism gives us something more, a realization that our powerlessness is not simply a momentary condition but the timeless quality of Way.  Brings this Chuang Tzu passage to mind:

If you hide your boat in a canyon, and then hide the mountain in a marsh, you may think the boat is safe and secure.  But something powerful might come in the dead of the night, heave it all onto huge shoulders and carry it away.  And then in your darkness you'd never know what happened.  Something large seems like the perfect place to hide something small, but there's something into which that too can vanish.  Only if you hide all beneath heaven inside all beneath heaven, so there's nothing more into which it can vanish – only then have you reached the vast and timeless nature of things. (86)

    The point here is not to counsel disengagement and complete political inaction.   There is still plenty that can be done to counter McCain and elect Obama.  Rather, this is a reminder that, whatever is done, there are always some things beyond our control, "…something into which that too can vanish."  Whether those unknowables will cut in favor of Obama or not is, well, unknown.  But here's hoping that Way returns to the US and Obama pulls out the victory in November.

UPDATE: Marc Ambinder , over at The Atlantic, had a similiar idea about fate; though I would disagree about Palin being the "black swan."   She's a fairly predictable conservative Republican.  The real "black swan" is still out there somewhere.

Sam Crane Avatar

Published by

Categories: ,

7 responses to “When Faced with the Absurdities of American Politics, The Taoism Helps”

  1. casey kochmer Avatar

    You are only powerless
    if you don’t live your own life…
    Too many live the life projected by society, by the ruling parties goals etc
    If you live your life, as yourself, you are the most powerful you can ever be, and fully free.
    The current BS of politics are just clouds moving underneath the mountain.

    Like

  2. Chris Avatar

    Sam,
    I’m with you. My impression was that the speech was god-awful. However, I fully expected the punditry and press to fawn today. The press fawned because the McCain camp has been “working the refs” for a few days now, and the press is easily turned in this way when the dreaded “liberal elite” card is threatened to be applied to them. In addition to that, frankly, the “tough young populist swinging back” stuff makes for great theater, and that’s what the press and punditry lives on. So no surprise there.
    For most, I think, they analyze this stuff based on the most superficial rhetorical scale you can come up with. Insofar as that goes, it was effective if the aim was simply to throw red meat and get people of holler in the convention hall. But for me, an effective speech is far more than just getting the Kool Aiders to clap harder for you. And I don’t think she succeeded in much more than that.
    I liked Sullivan’s claim that her substance and delivery was more appropriate to the campaign of a person running for high school student body council president. Seems right on to me.
    I should add, too, that I found the smug arrogance of her attacks on Obama to be beneath the office of VP. At some point as you go up, you have to at least pretend that you are above a certain kind of delivery/content.

    Like

  3. Theresa Avatar

    I’m glad to have found your blog, and at just the right time too, it seems 🙂 The Canadian media seems to be fawning over Palin’s speech as well. The parts I heard from it seemed very mean spirited to me. The part about hockey moms being like bulldogs with lipstick appalled me. I wouldn’t want a bulldog-type for a leader or a vice-leader. I would want a golden lab. I just don’t understand how being mean can be seen as being well-suited for leadership. But our society really seems to reward psychopathic traits, so I suppose I shouldn’t be surprised. I always am, though.

    Like

  4. isha Avatar
    isha

    September 2008
    Elaine Meinel Supkis
    http://elainemeinelsupkis.typepad.com/ezmoneymatters/2008/09/index.html
    The rise of Sarah Palin and her clutch of wild-living family are the perfect mirror of the collapse in morals that is rapidly destroying families. Far from being a traditional conservative, she is a radical sybaritic secessionist which seems to be the prevailing culture of a great swath of the ‘wrong side of the railroad tracks’ American landscape. This is where much of the battle for hearts and minds is now being waged as we saw in the Democratic Party’s nightmare

    The best analysis I found about the current state of the affairs of above-mentioned crazy lady, who speak it as it is…

    Like

  5. sabrina P Avatar
    sabrina P

    I found this blog at just the right time, too. I feel like a stranger in a strange land and I’m avoiding TV eventhough a hurricane is coming my way just to avoid the “S” word. I enjoy to talk politics, but I’m honestly ready to give up. I’m up late researching international universities, like McGill in Montreal. After reading one comment above, I see that might not be a viable escape, either. Waiting for the Taoist thinking to bring peace……..

    Like

  6. Dan Avatar

    This is why, with the exception of Bill Clinton, the Democrats have so much trouble winning the Presidency. I predicted and bet loads that Bush would beat Kerry and I based that on the elites (I am using that term here not as my own, but as a shorthand) and the media not understanding the common people (and again, I use this as a shorthand). I grew up in a Michigan working class neighborhood and it just absolutely amazes me how much the Coastal elites (I live in Seattle now) truly hate and look down on Middle America, and yet still are genuinely surprised to learn how much Middle America (again, this is a shorthand) hates the Coastal elites. You looked at Palin’s speech from the perspective of a professor at one of our countrys’ finest colleges, that is also on the East Coast. Middle America looked at Palin’s speech and came away with one thing: she is one of us. That is why the huge bump up in the polls and that is why I am predicting and betting on McCain-Palin.
    Hillary Clinton spoke to Middle America and she would have won, but the Democrats (of which I count myself one) are more interested in putting up candidates who reaffirm some sort of notion they have of themselves than one who can actually win. Hillary Clinton (and of course Bill too) would have known and been capable of fighting Palin-McCain on their turf, but Obama is not. Obama’s lack of bowling prowess (and joking about it) and his price of arugala comment (just by way of a couple examples) have stuck. Myt friends back in Michigan (both White and Black, none of whom had decided for whom they would be voting at the time) expressed the view that “for all of Obama’s talk” they felt he had no idea what “life is like for us out here.” Rightly or wrongly, I am guessing they believe Palin knows. It’s not the way a speech is given. It’s not even the words in the speech, nor is it even so much the policies. It’s the image. It’s the empathy. Bill Clinton said “I feel your pain” and people believed it. The best Obama can muster is to talk about the rising price of arugula and then smirk. That ain’t gonna fly.

    Like

  7. Sam Avatar

    I think you’re right. It is just depressing the the Republican mobilization of hate, or perhaps resentment is the better term, will possibly beat out Obama’s attempt to mobilize hope.

    Like

Leave a reply to sabrina P Cancel reply