A story in the LA Times a few days ago describes the opening of a Chinese-style garden in San Marino. Although it’s been a long time since I last strolled through the gardens of Suzhou or walked around West Lake in Hangzhou, I can say that I have always loved Chinese gardens, for all of the obvious aesthetic reasons. But I am not sure I would completely agree with this line:
"There are a lot of Taoist ideas in a garden," Li says of the Chinese
religion and philosophy. "Taoism put man in nature, where Confucianism
talks about man’s place in nature," she says.
First of all, the contrast with Confucianism could be drawn more starkly. I think it is safe to say that Confucianism would understand "man" as having much more capacity and efficaciousness in changing nature for "his" own purposes. I do not have my Analects here with me, but one passage says that Way does not shape man, but man shapes Way. Which is a fundamentally un-Taoist idea, and which also might inform, to a greater degree than Taoism, the project of Chinese garden-making.
Those gardens (and I imagine the California variety is quite nice) are master works of human engineering. What makes them so beautiful is how the carefully planned designs use natural ingredients – plants, water, overlooks, etc. – to craft a setting. The idea is for the builder of the garden to express a unique artistic vision through the medium of the organic materials, using and coordinating their growth and life cycles, to produce an enhanced "natural" environment. It is nature, but nature that has been subtly (and sometimes not so subtly) manipulated by man.
However much I might enjoy the end products (Master of the Fishing Nets in Suzhou has long been my favorite), I have to wonder, however, how Taoist all of this is. Taoism puts forth a much more limited notion of intervention in nature. Better just to leave things as they are, and let Way unfold as it will, then to take such effort to design and shape and push and pull nature for human ends.
What would a truly Taoist garden look like? Rather like an overgrown field or a old growth forest than the carefully crafted human creations of Suzhou and Hangzhou. They are, indeed, beautiful. But they are not really Taoist.

Leave a reply to Elizaveta Kramer Cancel reply