Remember the "surge"?  The increase in American troop levels in Iraq that was meant to improve the security situation and allow for political consolidation?  Well, it seems not to be working:

More than three months into a U.S.-Iraqi security offensive designed to curtail sectarian violence in Baghdad and other parts of Iraq, Health Ministry statistics show that such killings are rising again.

     This would come as no surprise to Sun Tzu, who understood that war-fighting was much more than simply quantities of men and munitions:

In war, numbers alone confer no advantage.  Do not advance relying on sheer military power. (9.45)

      Even though the Surge was preceded with verbiage about strategy and tactics, the sad truth is that there is no effective political strategy, and without a political strategy, the war fighting grinds on meaninglessly, only pushing off to a further date, at higher human cost, the inevitable withdrawal of US forces.

      Sun Tzu also has something to say to US military commanders:

If the situation is one of victory but the sovereign has issued orders not to engage, the general may decide to fight.  If the situation is such that he cannot win, but the sovereign has issued orders to engage, he need not do so. (10.18)

      Principled disobedience by military leaders can be a dangerous thing, especially in a democracy.  But it is painfully clear now that the only reason why the US presence in Iraq has not been scaled back is the vanity of Bush and Cheney.  We cannot "win" on the terms they have set out (a unified Iraq with "acceptable levels of violence").   We need to pull back, scale down, disengage from the "Surge".   At this point a US commitment to withdrawal would likely have a positive effect on the insurgency.   Bush won’t do it.  Congress is too divided to get the job done (insufficient votes to override a veto).  But if the generals came forward and said "no more," if they were willing to sacrifice their careers for the national good, they would be following in the grandest tradition of The Art of War.

     Bush lost the war.

Sam Crane Avatar

Published by

Categories: ,

4 responses to “Sun Tzu on the “Surge””

  1. The Cloudwalking Owl Avatar

    Canadians are currently going through a similar bout of collective military navel-gazing because of our war in Afganistan. Recently the presidents of both Afganistan and Pakistan have suggested that some sort of negotiated settlement with the Taliban would make sense. Unfortunately, because Canadians only see war through the lenses of WWII, we seem to have collectively lost the ability to negotiate with any enemy. As a result, the only “honourable” solution is one that involves complete and unconditional surrender of the enemy. This makes it much harder to disengage from foreign policy tar babies. I suspect the same problem is at work in the USA. Both of our societies have to get rid of their insane delusion that they are “superior” to any other and as such cannot stoop to deal with other nations as equals.

    Like

  2. Jeremiah Avatar

    “If the situation is one of victory but the sovereign has issued orders not to engage, the general may decide to fight. If the situation is such that he cannot win, but the sovereign has issued orders to engage, he need not do so. (10.18)”
    Brilliant. Thanks, Sam.

    Like

  3. jeff Avatar

    Well the surge seems to be making some progress now. Why not support it so that our troops can come home and leave a more stable regime in Iraq then if we just left now.

    Like

  4. Sam Avatar

    Good question. I reply in a new post on December 26, 2007

    Like

Leave a comment