For those few of you who read this blog regularly, you will notice I missed by usual Sunday "Modern Love" commentary (where I comment on the "Modern Love" column in the Sunday NYT; past examples here).  Instead, I was swept up in the weekend events of my 30th high school reunion.  It was the first time I had gone to such a celebration (I missed the 10th and 20th), and I was a bit apprehensive about how it would play out: what would it be like seeing people I had not seen in 30 years?  Would it be awkward and stand-offish?  Or would it be a rollicking good time?  I am happy to report it was the latter.  The five and a half hour dinner-dance rushed by as if it were an hour.  The re-gathering at a local bar that  stretched deep into the wee hours was loud and friendly and warm (I think of a Chinese term for having a good time, renao: "warm, loud").

    And the whole thing clarified for me a challenging aspect of Chinese cosmology (the definition and relationship of time and space).  More on that below the fold:

     First, a bit more description.  There were roughly eighty people there, out of a graduating class of about 275.  It was obviously a self-selected group: only the people who wanted to throw themselves into a reunion came; and, I imagine, those people were overwhelmingly comfortable enough with themselves to bear the scrutiny of high-school peers with questions lurking in the backs of minds ("what ever happened to…").  So, in a way, the event was bound to succeed because most everyone there wanted it to succeed.  Almost everyone was excited at the prospect of reconnecting with old acquaintances.

    But the night was not simply one of nostalgia.  We were not just living in, or trying to relive, the past.  What made it so fun was the sharing of a  moment in the present.  We laughed and drank and told stories and danced and made fun of one another in the immediacy of now.  We were not the same as we were but our present differences were complemented by our shared pasts.  The past and the present were occurring simultaneously.  The past had defined the present (our experiences 30 years ago are what established who was in the room) but the present was also defining the past (looking at each other now, we had a better understanding of whom we had been then).  This made the night quite fun but is also captures something about Chinese cosmology.

     In traditional China there was no creation myth (like the Biblical Genesis) and the universe was assumed to be timeless and self-generating.  From this perspective, there is a human dimension to time (the linear unfolding of a life: birth, youth, adulthood, demise, death) but there is also a broader cosmic dimension to time, where there is no "beginning" or "end," no distinction between past and present.  The human and cosmic times are not wholly distinct from one another.  We move out of cosmic time, in a rough sort of way, when we are born, and we move back into cosmic time when we die.  Timeless cosmic "time" surrounds and infuses our linear time-bound human existence.

    Here’s a line from Frederick Mote’s wonderful little book, Intellectual Foundations of China:

The cosmic process is one in which all stages are simultaneously present. (25).

    

I have always had a hard time imaging what this line might mean concretely.  How could all "stages" be "simultaneously present?"  Our Western linear sense of time makes it hard to envision such simultaneity.  But that is what the reunion did for me.  In a very real and immediate way two stages of my life which, up until that time, had been largely distinct from one another (very few of my old high school friends had much knowledge of what I do now) were occurring simultaneously.  And, if I think about it more, that is true for all moments of my life always.

     Now, perhaps my physicist friends (are you out there Jenkins?) can write to either confirm or reject this as a physical possibility.  But, even if they say it can’t happen, I won’t believe them.  I was there in the room and at the bar; and past and present were unfolding all at the same moment.  It could be ugly at times – as when drunken forty-eight year-old men started singing along to jukebox Eagles songs (not my choice!) – but, for the most part it was beautiful.

 

Sam Crane Avatar

Published by

Categories:

7 responses to “A Timeless Thirty Years”

  1. Uncle Vanya Avatar
    Uncle Vanya

    How different from my 30th hs reunion. I also missed my 10th and 20th. But I was one of the pariahs in 1975 and not many talked to me even 30 years later. But I got a date out of it at least, with a beauty from 1975.

    Like

  2. John Devon (Uncle Vanya) Avatar
    John Devon (Uncle Vanya)

    Not incidentally I received I-Ching Hex 5, “Waiting” line 5 which I think referred to “waiting at meat and drink” at my August 30 year high school reunion. The resultant hexagram is Tai, Peace.Still waiting.

    Like

  3. deb ament fieldhouse Avatar
    deb ament fieldhouse

    our lives are forever intertwined because our paths crossed those many years ago, the difference now is that the playing field has been made level

    Like

  4. Bruce Jenkins Avatar
    Bruce Jenkins

    Incredible how you have managed to put together this piece in such a short span of time (of course if all is happening simultaneously then perhaps isn’t that much of a trick!). In reality, I think you have the reunion to thank for helping you to crack the nut of how all stages are “simultaneously present”. In my opinion, you have come to a brilliant interpretation and, if I had to hazard a guess, one that comes closest to the original insight. As to the physical possibility of such temporal disordering, I think many modern physical interpretations are not inconsistent with such views on time, with one caveat. Most modern cosmologists would adhere only to the principle of causality i.e. that space-time trajectories that lead to you being able to kill your grandfather (why on earth you would want to) are not allowed. Not to stray too far afield, but with all the multiple universe interpretations and the overwhelming amounts of dark energy and matter that control our thermodynamic destiny, it is too early to say what ancient worldly interpretations may come closest to the truth. In practice, I have always been uncomfortable with the detailed analogies drawn between ancient schools of thought and modern physics a la Fritoj Capra’s “The Tao of Physics”. While such analogies are quite instructive as to how it is humans try to come to grips with the great sea of mystery surrounding us, they always tend to break down at some point. In my opinion this is because the true language of our modern physical understanding of the universe is mathematics. How is it that the “unreasonable effectiveness” of mathematics for helping us interpret the mysterious beyond becomes translated into more verbal language is an interesting, yet perplexing, question.
    Like you, I did not attend 10 or 20. Like you, I was quite pleased with 30. I am reminded of what my brother-in-law told me about reunions. He said the 10th is uptight because everyone is trying to demonstrate how successful they have become (as well as trying to pick each other up). The 20th is obsessed with who has what, carreers, kids, divorces etc. The 30th is much more relaxed as every wise adult has come to the realization that we are what we will be. The need to compete is now replaced with a sincere attempt to talk to the person who is now. I would have to state the plus ca change plus ca meme aphorism never seemed more germane than on Saturday night. How is it that I immediately remembered so and so’s name with a 30 year hiatus and no thought of so and so in between ?
    Keep on blogging bro.

    Like

  5. Sam Avatar

    Deb, Jenkins,
    I’m so glad you’ve paused to comment. It gets lonely out here blogging in the wilderness (actually, there are a few intrepid souls who comment quite regularly with really good insights).
    When I first read Deb’s comment, I thought: is the playing field truly level now in some way that it was not 30 years ago? After all, a fair number of people chose not to come. Perhaps they feel the social “playing field” is still somehow uneven. But Jenkins, as usual, clarified things for me. I think for most of us there it really was a matter of accepting that “we are what we will be.” How very Taoist of you, Jenkins. Are you reading Chuang Tzu on the side?

    Like

  6. J.R. Delohery Avatar
    J.R. Delohery

    The reunion offered an interesting perspective from which from social side. The class is the same, people the same where ideals are different with commonality of friendship the link. A great time to reflect where we come from, been through and now another great future chapter for all to look forward to and enjoy! JD

    Like

  7. Chris Cuddihy Avatar
    Chris Cuddihy

    Dear Fellow Reunion-ites,
    First let me say how glad I am that I squeezed through that same crowded, local tavern by 2:00am so that I wasn’t caught in the inevitable Eagles sing-a-long that Sam endured sometime after that.
    2nd, I think Bruce’s (Jenkins) brother in-law’s somewhat cliche analysis of reunions: 10, 20 & 30 yrs, fits my experience well. I made it to all of those and this was the best… it seemed like a purer celebration of life–our own, w/o anything to prove or hide.
    I teach High Schoolers in my present path and came back to the classroom seeking a way to convey the insight that had resonanted down to my sentimental core. While watching the slide-show of our comraderie from 30 years ago, it seemed very Vonnegut like to me… we were there, yet here, yet here was there and there was here. Time was certainly being looped, but more so… time was being revealed. As Sam implied, time had become richer and more dimensional then simple ticks on a clock. The truth is that the Cartesian splintering of time into contiguous pieces does a great dis-service to our comprehension of how experience accumulates. Having those slides wash over me was like having the lid to a Zen Koan lifted. Suddenly the seeming contradictions of time and space were lifted. I know I failed to find a way to express the emotional meaningfulness to my students. All I could say was how clearly I saw the preciousness of that time in our lives. The best I can hope for is that they got a sense of it, if not from my words, then from the timbre of voice and moistness in my eyes. Yet, maybe its not necessary that they get it now… maybe the lack of such consciousness is what made our faces so raw and lusciously fresh. Maybe they have the insight already, and it is us–30 years later that needed to see it again, to get it back and to remember.
    Personally my only regret at the Reunion was that the lure of the dance detained me from eperiencing as many quality dialogues as I would have liked. I’ve known for awhile that we were blessed w/ numerous interesting people in our class. Happily this web-site can provide me access at least to one formidable example of what the class of ’75 produced. Thanks for sharing Sam.
    Meanwhile, for all Reunion-ities, I’m still promoting (and will for a long time) the ’75th reunion. My slogan is, “I’m coming, but I’m not leaving!” At 93 I think it will be the perfect time and place to say good-bye and I’m hoping for a collective concurrence. I know Bruce has agreed to join me.

    Like

Leave a comment