The Useless Tree

Oh, no, it’s only rock and roll….

I have never been a fan of Guns n' Roses.  They hit when I was a struggling assistant professor, too busy with my academic work to concern myself with new rock bands.  And having been influenced by earlier bands, like Velvet Underground, I was certainly not shocked by GN'R's pose.  So, I was unaware that they were working on a new album, which just came out.  And I certainly did not expect them to become embroiled in political controversy with the PRC government.

CCP censors are now looking to block all things GN'R due to the new album, Chinese Democracy.  Now, it can't be simply because of the title.  After all, the CCP itself claims that it is engaged in a democratic project.  Even if GN'R doesn't quite fit into the category of "democracy with Chinese characteristics," the term "Chinese democracy" alone should not banish them from the fertile markets of the mainland (which is, after all, what this is all about).

Rather, the net nannies are likely more concerned with a lyric or two.  The reference to Falun Gong, perhaps; or the mention of "iron fist" to rule the nation; or this portent:

When your great wall rocks blame yourself
While their arms reach up for your help
And you're out of time.

But this hardly seems sufficient to warrant the attention of the ruling party of a great power.  Even more, it doesn't seem so threatening to merit the blusterous response by a state-run newspaper in Beijing, calling the album a "venemous attack" on the nation.  Come on, it's just rock and roll, not a political movement.

The banning of this music strikes me as a sign of a lack of confidence on the part of the CCP leadership.  Why should they fear a group of noisy, washed-up rock and rollers?  Yes, it reminds some of the horrible events of 1989.  But it is virtually impossible that an album will somehow spawn a revivalist political movement, pouring into the streets calling for democracy.  That's just not going to happen today in China.  We might see an increase in protests and demostrations due to the effects of economic crisis.  But it will not be a replay of 1989. 

So what's the big deal?

The claim that the CCP is concerned about preserving "Chinese culture" from the corrosive effects of wild, hedonistic foreigners is also unbelievable.  The party gave up long ago on such cultural control. Indeed, it is precisely the relinquishment of cultural surveillance which has given us things like Chinese punk rock (this cut is called "Don't Forget the Class Struggle":


And while I'm at it, let me put up one of my all time favorite rock and
roll political statements, "Son of Orange County," by Frank Zappa (the
youtube clip has only audio, no video).  It ridicules Nixon.  The main
line of the chorus: "I just can't believe you are such a fool."  Now,
that is a venomous attack:

Sam Crane Avatar

Published by

Sam Crane
I have moved The Useless Tree to WordPress. Hope this works!
Categories:

11 responses to “Oh, no, it’s only rock and roll….”

  1. isha Avatar
    isha

    The Bread and Circus is the defining feature of ALL the EMPIRES. It is only fitting for the fashion of the CENTER to spread to the peripheral China. In the final analysis, it is the least corrupted culture that will stand and survive and maybe, recover …

    Like

    Reply
  2. Sam Crane Avatar
    Sam Crane

    But what does “corruption” mean here? In what ways is China “corrupted?” When did such “corruption” begin? 1898? 1919? 1949? 1978? Personally, I gave up on the idea of an uncorrupted, authentic culture – American, Chinese, whatever – long ago. It’s not about “corruption,” it’s about change.
    But if you want to insist on a notion of “corruption,” then a question arises: who did more to corrupt Chinese culture: Qinshi Huangdi, Mao Zedong, or The Ramones?

    Like

    Reply
  3. isha Avatar
    isha

    I guess I am a kind of primitive in believing that there ARE some kind of relatively healthy, wholesome culture, like Bach’s music and yes they don’t have to have a nationality. I do suspect there might be some kind of connections between the rise of the rock and roll (the decline of classical music in the west) and the turning of U.S. from a productive society to a consumer society (republic to empire).
    Hamilton and Jefferson’s time is the purest form of American culture. I am referring to their writings and instructions to their children.
    Looking at the Chinese punk in the first Youtube, he looks like a monkey, sounds like a monkey and walks like a monkey and the so-called “music” just turn the audience in a mob vie passion provoking noises. It is the demeaning of humanity that I regard as corruption, not the origin of the form.
    Yes, ” Change” is the word of the day, but there are two directions for the Changing: Change for the good and change for the bad, or worse.

    Like

    Reply
  4. Sam Crane Avatar
    Sam Crane

    I know what you mean. I don’t really like punk rock as music; I see it more as a sociological phenomenon, which tells us something about social change. But I am too much of a Taoist to have faith in the possibility of high culture. We can only really watch as Way unfolds….

    Like

    Reply
  5. pcvirginiabeach Avatar
    pcvirginiabeach

    I think there was something to Punk. It was part of the youth rebellion against the consumption society in the 80s, and a looked at life through the crude lenses of simple foul language, violence, and brutal realities. It was a dull instrument, like a blunt hammer that smashed bone, rather than the scalpel that Frank Zappa used to lead us into crude ironies and decadence. No less effective, just another form. Remember, punk was a form of rebellion that used appearance as much as it used music, to shock American sensibilities.
    It’s a holiday in Cambodia. It’s tough kid but it’s life!

    http://www.lyricsfreak.com/d/dead+kennedys/holiday+in+cambodia_20038157.html

    Like

    Reply
  6. isha Avatar
    isha

    PC: Punk might be part of “youth rebellion against the consumption society”, but it might also be “part of the consumption society.” The very audience in the punk performance might very be the same group who charge their credit cards to their limits in the shopping malls, especially in the coming X’mss season…Both activities, listening a Punk performance and shopping aimlessly, don’t need much effort and discipline, unlike classic music. I don’t want to get into the drug and sex “sub-culture” related to Punk.
    http://atimes.com/atimes/China/JL02Ad01.html
    Fortunately for China, Punk could only exist on the fringe of the Chinese society but Lang Lang is a folk hero, both in China and in South Korea.
    Whoever is less corrupt will survive this coming mess …

    Like

    Reply
  7. Sam Crane Avatar
    Sam Crane

    Isha,
    Why do you believe that “whoever is less corrupt will survive this coming mess…”? What is your reasoning here?

    Like

    Reply
  8. isha Avatar
    isha

    The very unsustainability of the current system is very obvious since it is counter-Taoism. Each and every word of 5,000 characters of the Tao Te Ching advise against the current reigning culture …

    Like

    Reply
  9. isha Avatar
    isha

    Sam:
    As to the suvivability I have a very personal observation:
    Mexican labors ( 90% are in the category of ” illegal aliens” ) working ten hours a day on a salary of $ 7.50 cash are always laughing and singing and are genuinely happy. They usually produce a big family.
    The downtown financial elites who live in million dollar houses in the suburb ( on borrowed money ) will not survive the humiliation of living in a apartment and work as day labors for a chance ( they don’t have the necessary skills and physical strength, neither ). They live a much stressed life as a group to keep up the appearances. They usually are not producing (both in terms of value and in terms of family members.
    The Meek Should Inherit the Earth. (I guess the meek usually don’t consumer Punk music)
    P.S.
    I guess this guy, Mr. Gao, concurring with me on the unsustainability of the current system even though he is very much a insiders.
    http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200812/fallows-chinese-banker/2

    Like

    Reply
  10. Sam Crane Avatar
    Sam Crane

    But why does the unsustainability of the current system necessitate the emergence of some sort of “uncorrupted” alternative? The current system could fall and another, equally “corrupted,” system take its place. After all, the Tao Te Ching also held that the system of its own time was corrupt and unnatural. Why assume either progress or return?

    Like

    Reply
  11. isha Avatar
    isha

    Sam:
    I do agree with you on the tendency of the system to corrupt. I also agree with you that Tao Te Ching held the system of its own time as corrupted and unnatural. But I would like to add that system might not be “equally” corrupt.
    Zhou dynasty, at its very beginning, is a healthy, productive and cultured system. That is partly the reason why it lasted for 800 years and one of the longest reigning dynasties in the world history. Confucius certainly had great admiration for the Count of Zhou, the founding father of the Zhou. But after the pasting of the times, the principles of the system (the ritual of Zhou) were compromised and culture corrupted. ( Are there any parallels here with the compromising of the American republic principles designed by the U.S. founding fathers?…See, they invented a republic and you are having an empire, on the model of Augusta of Roman Empire).
    In terms of financial models, Bretton Woods I was a masterpiece, it certainly served U.S. interest but it also performed a public function internationally. But the floating currency system founded on 1971 is a purely parasitical and speculative. It turned the productive U.S. system into a parasitical financier controlled system and it brought destruction to the U.S. manufacturing sector. Wall Street parasites reign supreme now and they are really running the U.S. political system. There is no chance in the world to export this system. It couldn’t even save itself.
    That is what I call corruption of the current system and any system coming out of the ashes might be better than the current one … of course, they will, too be corrupted in its own time but that would be another story.

    Like

    Reply

Leave a comment