Yesterday was tax day in the US, the day when federal, and I believe most state, income tax forms must be filed.  For many years I used to do my taxes by myself, and this day was certainly a worry for me.  A couple of years ago, however, due to income from my writing which came to define me, in the eyes of the tax authorities, as an independent business (and my wife, due to her various forms of community involvement became an independent contractor), I turned to an accountant.  Paying someone else to figure out what I must pay the government does take some of the pain out of it….

    In any event, I realized yesterday that I should do a post on Mencuis and taxes.  He has much to say on the topic.  But the idea popped into my head as I was cleaning the dishes after dinner and my text was not there with me.  But it is here with me now, so let’s jump right in.

    Mencius is a low tax man.  I suspect that he calls for limited taxes because, in his time, a serious source of injustice and inequality was rapacious abuse of state power to extract revenue from society.  Notice in this passage how he focuses on rents as opposed to taxes or tariffs or tribute:

Collect rent in the markets but no tax, or enforce laws but collect no rent – then every merchant throughout all beneath Heaven will rejoice and long to trade in your markets.  Conduct inspections at the border but collect no tax – then every traveler throughout all beneath Heaven will rejoice and long to travel your roads.    Have farmers help with public fields but collect no tax – then every farmer in all beneath Heaven will rejoice and long to work your land.  Don’t demand tributes in cloth from families and villages – then people throughout all beneath Heaven will rejoice and long to become your subjects.  (3.5)

    He understands the state’s need for revenue, but "rent" here suggests limited and fixed annual (or some period of time, monthly…) levy.  While a percentage of the value of production or commerce might yield higher receipts for the government, it would also impose greater burdens on society.

      We should not take from the passage above the idea that Mencius was anti-tax.  No.  He was interested in limiting taxation.  The famous well field system that he advocated, which reserved one farm plot out of nine for communal work and aristocratic requisition, could be understood as a form of taxation.  Thus, Mencius says:

In the countryside, tax people one ninth of their produce, according to the well-field system.  In the capital, tax people one tenth of their income.  (5.3)

    Notice that city dwellers, which would include businessmen and other professionals, must also pay an income tax.  It is a flat tax.  Although the overall system is mildly regressive (10% tax rate for "rich" city dwellers, and an 11% rate for poorer farmers), there is a minimum welfare that he would guarantee to all people – access to land and livelihood.

       (Notice, too, in the same passage 5.3 Mencius seems to support the infamous PRC hukou system when he says: "People should never leave their village – not when they move their houses and not when they die.")

     He also warns about not taxing enough, something that uncivilized governments do.  Indeed, "barbarians" tax at very low rates precisely because they do not have the finer institutions and practices of higher civilization to maintain   Here’s how  Mencius replies when asked if a tax rate of one part in twenty (5%) is sufficient as it is for the "Northern barbarians":

    Northern barbarians don’t grow the five grains, only millet.  They have no city walls or buildings, no ancestral temples, no sacrificial rituals.  The have no august lords, no diplomatic hospitality or gifts.  And they don’t have the hundred government offices and officials.  That why one part in twenty is enough tax for them.  but here in the Middle Kingdom(s), how can we do without noble-minded leaders and the bond of human community? (12.10)

     Makes me think of Oliver Wendell Holmes’ famous line: "taxes are what we pay for living in a civilized society."

Sam Crane Avatar

Published by

Categories: ,

6 responses to “Mencius on Taxes”

  1. isha Avatar
    isha

    Poor, poor kings of Lu ,Qi and Liang ( I need to check which one Mencius was advising when he made these remarks on taxation) even the mighty Qin in the Chinese spring and autumn don’t have the tools sets of modern emperors.
    Let’s try to count these missing tools:
    1. They don’t have the paper money, so it is difficult to use inflation as a state policy to fleece the general population. Even though they are minting national currencies at the time, they would have to base them on precious metals.
    2. There were a lot of “international trade” and “international consultants” running around these days, but no country could create a international fiat money ( IOUs) and then forcing the other countries to debase these IOUs. Could one find a better way to taxing the world than that? Comparing it with the tribute system of these Chinese emperors, what a civilized world we are living in now?!
    3. They can’t create electronic money out of thin air and then create a myth vie a general population brainwashing machine called media and education that it is just as good as gold and consumption of the first world is saving the world from collapsing.
    4. The existence of a self-serving, family based money changers elite class across the world. They can create miracles. Such is the current situation whereby trillions of dollars are spent to bail out the banking system, trillions of dollars are spent on war, and people are deliberately starved by a combination of financial policy and food cartel machinations and 20-30% of fertile land in the north American were designed to create fuel and petrol price are pushing up over $ 100 ( the lifting cost, remember is less than 10). Forcing each and everyone of us, doesn’t’ matter you are in the first, second or the third work, we would have to pay our taxes to this elites when you pump your gas in the car, buy our daily bread and turn on your light or computer… I feel you pain, Mencius, no wonder you were treated so badly in Liang court and nobody listen to you, you are just not as smart as Greenspan and can’t span a better story…… Look how Neocon’s treatment in our current Emperor’s court and courts of France, German and U.K… just turn green with envy and die again …
    http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/IH01Dj01.html
    Isha

    Like

  2. Zoomzan Avatar
    Zoomzan

    Isha,
    Again I’m really curious. Did you get these views by reading Mises and Hayek? Or maybe Lewrockwell?
    It’s interesting because just a few posts ago you were very anti-capitalist. Or maybe I’ve misunderstood your posts.

    Like

  3. Isha Avatar
    Isha

    Zoomzan… for your inoformation, I read Hayek years ago but not very impressed. Haven’t read many on Mises and Lewrockwell but now you mention it, I might check them out.
    On whatever theories, I always try to check their relevency on the social and economic reality and many theorists have their social agendas.

    Like

  4. Zoomzan Avatar
    Zoomzan

    Another good author is Hazlitt.
    Actually, most of Mises’s publications are available for free online. I really recommend his book “Bureaucracy.”
    You can also find free books on Austrian economics here: http://www.garynorth.com/public/3112.cfm. Gary North is a Christian Reconstructionist. Since I’m not Christian I don’t read his bible commentaries, but I enjoy his economic analyses.
    I like Lewrockwell and the Cato Institute, because they are very fair with China. The Cato Institute explicitly forbids China-bashing in its articles.

    Like

  5. Zoomzan Avatar
    Zoomzan

    One reason I like Lewrockwell is that most columnists are very honourable. They’re mostly American patriots, but they respect other nations’ patriots also.
    This is in stark contrast to the Neo-Cons which dominate both the Republicans and the Democrats today.

    Like

  6. Isha Avatar
    Isha

    zoomzan:
    Thanks for the info. I did find Lewrockwell very interesting now I read some more. BTW, I am a big fan of Ron Paul. Too bad he doesn’t have a real chance to win but I wish he can wake people up for some serious discussion and reflections.
    Isha

    Like

Leave a comment