They’re celebrating in China and Taiwan (though they say it is merely the 2557th birthday) and Hawaii (thanks Kim!).  Below the fold is an excerpt from last year’s Useless Tree Confucian birthday post…

…..And that brings me to what I really
want to talk about: how to make the writing of Confucius himself (i.e.
before it was revised in the Han dynasty and after) relevant to modern
life.  Here are three easy steps:

     1.  Go all the way with gender
equality.  Perhaps the most pernicious effects of Confucianism stemmed
historically from the ways in which it was interpreted and used to
subjugate women.  His own time was certainly one of patriarchy, which
was not peculiar to China.  And for most of Chinese history following
his time, and most of world history for that matter, women were
culturally and politically subordinated to men.  But times have happily
changed.  And Confucian thought, if it is to be useful in a
contemporary context, must now assume that there is no moral
distinction between men and women on gender grounds alone.  When we
refer to "elders" and "parents" in Confucian thought, these days we
must refer to men and women together.  Children owe their mothers the
same sort of respect and consideration due their fathers; and elder
women must be held in the same regard as elder men.  There, that’s easy.

     2.  Detach Confucianism from
Legalism.  The great sleight of hand of the Han dynasty was to declare
"Confucianism" the state ideology, create a curriculum to study his
thought, but all the while maintain the stern, un-Confucian political practices of the Qin dynasty.
(follow the link and scroll down to "state Confucianism").  The Han
were not as brutal as Qin.  However, they "legalized" Confucianism,
using law and punishment as means to enforce a Confucian-esque public
and political morality.  This was, of course, a break with Confucius
himself, who believed that the proper way to engender morality was
through exemplary behavior of ethically aware gentlemen (and women, we
will now say).  It is only because of the Han revision that a place
like Singapore could possibly be considered "Confucian."  We need to
throw off the Legalist yoke and get back to the Confucius of gentler
persuasion.

    3.  Think of Ritual in everyday terms.  I get this from Fingarette,
who talks about how a handshake is a form of Confucian ritual.  What I
like about this notion is that it requires us to think carefully about
the most mundane daily tasks: if we put our heart into those, and
cultivate them to preserve our closest loving relationships, we are
then moving toward Humanity.  Ritual is not just about Births and
Weddings and Funerals; it is also about doing the myriad daily tasks
that hold our families and social networks together.  This makes
Confucian morality more demanding, but it also brings it down to a
concretely human level.

     I could probably come up with
more "easy steps" but I have to get back to the demands of my day job.
Anyone have any further suggestions?

Sam Crane Avatar

Published by

2 responses to “Happy 2558th Birthday, Confucius!”

  1. justsomeguy Avatar
    justsomeguy

    4) Follow them through. Ruism neither started nor ended with Confucius, so while certain aspects of the Analects may appear dated to us, if we follow them through history up to the modern time we can see how they have developed into a fully modern concept. The classics were distilled by Confucius. This product was complimented by Mencius and Xunzi; further refined by Zhu Xi; reforumalted by Wang Yangming; polished by Wang Fuzhi, Kaibara Ekken, Yi Yulgok, T’oegye, Xiong Shili; modernized by Feng Youlan and Tu Weiming; liberalized by Yu Dan; Westernized by any number of philosophers like Rodger Ames, David Hall, Bryan Van Norden, ect.
    There is no need to try and jump from two-and-a-half thousand years ago to right now in one go — there is a well worn path for the student to walk. Sometimes it might veer off into strange curly-ques (Uncrowned King movement, I’m looking at you), but I think that enduring inspiration can be found along the totality of the path. Even, or perhaps especially, in disagreement.

    Like

Leave a comment