I just have to comment on this (link via ESWN).
It seems that some students in New Zealand satirized Mao Zedong by making him a "cover girl:"
Fairly tame, and funny, I thought. But Chinese students in New Zealand (I think this includes students visiting from the PRC and Chinese-New Zealand citizens) took offense. I was shocked by this statement:
UCOL student Xing Tang said Chaff [the magazine] staff are ignorant of Chinese culture. “Chairman Mao is like Jesus to us,” he said on the verge of tears.
To think that someone would still be willing to deify Mao like this is remarkable. Obviously, this student has not studied PRC history and politics. Would he still have the same opinion of Mao if he dug deep into the tragedy of the Great Leap Forward? Chinese students in New Zealand may well face discrimination of various sorts, as they contend (and as demonstrated in some of the comments in the "cover girl" post), but it is hard to see how any of that can possibly justify continuing veneration of a man who did so much to destroy "Chinese culture."
Nationalism can do strange things to people.
UPDATE: This is a bigger thing than I realized: Chinese netizens oppose auction of Mao Zedong’s portrait:
"I strongly oppose the auction of Chairman Mao’s portrait because it is
neither a mere piece of artistic work nor a commercial activity. Mao
Zedong is the spirit of our great nation, " an anonymous person said on
the Internet.
Please ask this person: how many Chinese died during the Great Leap Forward?
UP-UPDATE: Just so we can all agree that no "national father" is above satire, let’s remember this image, which stands up quite well next to the Cosmo-Mao:


Leave a comment